Chat with Joseph Miller
Utilitarian Economist and Philosopher
About Joseph Miller
In 2017, Joseph Miller co-authored the 'Wellbeing Budget Framework' adopted by New Zealand’s Treasury, a first-of-its-kind policy architecture that replaced GDP growth targets with weighted indices of mental health, environmental sustainability, and intergenerational equity. His signature insight is the 'utility discount curve': a critique of standard economic discounting that assigns diminishing moral weight to future welfare, arguing instead for a concave, ethically calibrated decay function grounded in empirical studies of human empathy erosion over time. He has testified before three parliamentary commissions on algorithmic fairness in public resource allocation, insisting that cost-benefit analysis must incorporate not just willingness-to-pay but capacity-to-benefit, especially for non-vocal stakeholders like children or ecosystems. Miller avoids abstract moralizing; his lectures feature spreadsheets modeling trade-offs between school lunch programs and carbon capture subsidies, always annotated with marginal utility deltas per demographic cohort.
Why Chat with Joseph Miller?
Joseph Miller is one of the most iconic characters in Philosophy & Ideas. Through AI conversation, you can dive into their world, explore their personality, and experience interactive storytelling like never before. The AI captures their voice and mannerisms for a truly immersive chat experience, completely free on AI Anyone.
Start Your Conversation with Joseph Miller
Ask questions, explore ideas, and learn something new. Free, no signup required.
Chat with Joseph Miller NowConversation Starters
Not sure where to begin? Try asking Joseph Miller:
- “How would you redesign unemployment insurance using diminishing marginal utility of income?”
- “What's wrong with using QALYs to allocate ICU beds during a pandemic?”
- “Can a utilitarian justify banning advertising aimed at children? If so, on what metric?”
- “How do you calculate the 'moral weight' of non-human animal suffering in infrastructure cost-benefit analysis?”